http://dinarrvnews.net/guru/tnt-tony/ This conference call from 2006 by TNT Tony, known as TNT Dinar, was when he was running his 14 daily plus ponzi scheme scam http://www.14dailyplus.com/ from 2006 to 2007. This call is similar to his Iraqi Dinar conference calls.
I will be posting more on http://dinarrvnews.net/
Tony pleaded guilty in 2015 for his crimes, here is some of the court data for case 2:12-cr-20041-CM:
UPDATE – 11/30/2015 COURT DOCUMENTS – http://www.slideshare.net/iraqidinar/tnt-dinar-tnt-tony-court-sentencing-documents-tony-renfrow
TNT Tony Court Documents: http://www.slideshare.net/iraqidinar/…
On or about April 26, 2007, in the District of Kansas and elsewhere, the defendants, ANTHONY RENFROW and WILLIAM “BILL” FOX, for the purpose of executing the scheme to defraud, transmitted and caused to be transmitted in interstate commerce, by means of a wire communication, certain signs,signals, and sounds, that is, a web-based conference call with participants in Kansas and California, to assure participants in 14DailyPlus.com that their “investments” were safe and none would lose their “funds.
Guilty Plea – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDmJc…
34. This was in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2 and 1343. Forfeiture Allegation 35. Upon conviction of one or more of the offenses alleged in Counts 1-2, the defendants, ANTHONY RENFROW and WILLIAM “BILL” FOX, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), any propertyconstituting or derived from proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the said violations, including but not limited to the following: Money Judgment 36.
Press Release Regarding Plea Change to Guilty – http://www.wdrb.com/story/29065207/ir…
A sum of money approximately ,825,000.00 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds obtained as a result of the offenses set out in Counts 1-2, for which the defendants are jointly and severally liable. Substitute Assets 37. If any of the above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the defendants:
a. cannot be located upon the exercise of d diligence;
b. has been transferred, sold to, or deposited with a third party;
c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;
d. has been substantially diminished in value; or
e. has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without difficulty; it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p) as incorporated by Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(b), to seek forfeiture of any other property of said defendants up to the value of the forfeitable property described above. 38.
TNT Tony – http://globalcurrencyreset.net/tnt-to…
This is all in accordance with Title 18, United States Code, Sections 981(a)(1)(c) and 982(a)(1); Title 28 United States Code, Section 2461 (c); and Rule 32.2(a), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
TNT Tony 14 Daily Plus Conference Call – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRj57…